Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists
От | Henry B. Hotz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | v04020a23b38ddec7d480@[137.78.84.130] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres mailing lists (Chris Bitmead <chris.bitmead@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
At 9:16 PM -0700 6/15/99, Chris Bitmead wrote: >Is it really necessary that the mailing lists block "non-member >submissions"?. I have several email addresses and this is rather >inconvenient. I don't know how postgres does it exactly, but NetBSD has open lists and some aggressive kind of spam filtering based on known spammers. I think it's been very nice to have discussions, for example, which span both the port-mac68k@netbsd.org list and e.g. a MkLinux list. The spam filtering seems to be very effective since I only see a piece of spam on the netbsd lists once every 3 months or so. I would suggest you consider cooperating with them to use whatever mechanism they use. As another specific example there was a person on port-mac68k who was getting postgres up on a Mac 68k system and having some problems. I tried to cross-post my responses to the postgres-ports lists, but they never appeared. I was doing it from this very email address on this very machine. Aside from the 'now' - 'current' problem I reported earlier, his were mostly related to interactions among the NetBSD installation, the NetBSD package system and our install instructions rather than to any fundamental deficiencies in postgres. However I think he had valid problems which I think the Postgres documenters could address, and which would improve our product. I think it is unfortunate that I was not able to involve one of the postgres lists in the discussion. Signature failed Preliminary Design Review. Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated. h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: